COMMONWEALTH vs. SHERMAN BARTHELMY 2000-P-0103 Court Case Public Record

  • Details

    Case TitleCOMMONWEALTH vs. SHERMAN BARTHELMY
    Case Number2000-P-0103
    Case TypeCriminal
    StateMassachusetts, MA
    CountyEssex
    CourtEssex Superior Court
    Court Address
    Phone
    Field Date09/17/1997
    Close Date02/16/2001
  • Parties

    CounselNameType
    Elin H. Graydon, A.D.A.
    Commonwealth
    Plaintiff/Appellee
    John Traficonte, Esquire
    Sherman Barthelmy
    Defendant/Appellant
  • DOCKET ENTRIES
    Entry Date Paper Entry Text
    01/20/2000 #1 Transcripts received: NONE
    01/20/2000 #2 Entered.
    02/29/2000 #3 MOTION for expedited appeal, filed by Sherman Barthelmy.
    02/29/2000 #4 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Sherman
    03/01/2000 #5 RE#2 The appellee is given leave to file a memorandum in lieu of a brief no later than March 30, 2000. No enlargements are to be sought. (Perretta, J.). Notice
    04/03/2000 #6 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
    04/03/2000 #7 RE#4 Denied. (Perretta, J.). Notice..
    04/06/2000 #8 Motion to reconsider paper #4 filed by Commonwealth.
    04/07/2000 RE#5 If the memorandum in lieu of brief is filed on or before 4/14/00, it shall be deemed timely; otherwise, the matter shall proceed to screening forthwith. (Perretta, J.). Notice.
    04/18/2000 SERVICE of brief & supplemental appendix for Plaintiff/Appellee Commonwealth.
    05/03/2000 Letter from Atty Trficonte w/attach re: Request appeal be expedited.
    05/05/2000 RE#7: Denied. The appeal shall proceed in due course. (Lenk, J.) Notice
    05/12/2000 Letter from ADA Graydon re: Unavailable 7/17, 7/28-8/15/00.
    12/06/2000 Placed on December non-argument list.
    12/06/2000 Under consideration by Panel. (P J GS).
    01/17/2001 Letter from ADA Graydon re: Unavailable 2/19-2/23/01 & 4/12-4/20/01.
    02/16/2001 MEMO & ORDER: "...we remand this matter to the Superior Court for review and findings with respect to the basis for the denial of the motion filed on September 20, 1999. If it is determined that the September motion was not denied on its merits, the merits of the December, 1999, motion before us are to be addressed. We reserve jurisdiction of this matter." (Perretta, Jacobs, Gelinas, JJ.) *Notice/attest/Whitehead, J./Welch, J./image.