Manro v. City of Tulare et al. F073201 Court Case Public Record

  • Details

    Case TitleManro v. City of Tulare et al.
    Case NumberF073201
    Case TypeCV
    StateCalifornia, CA
    CountyAll Counties
    CourtAppellate Court
    Court Address5th Appellate District
    Phone
    Field Date
    Close Date10/31/2016
  • Parties

    CounselNameType
    Pro Per
    Don Manro
    Plaintiff and Appellant
    Martin D. Koczanowicz
    Koczanowicz & Hale
    4215 Tierra Rejada Road, #185
    Moorpark, CA 93021

    David Phillip Hale
    KOCZANOWICZ & HALE
    Attorney at Law
    401 Clovis Ave, Ste. 208
    Clovis, CA 93612

    City of Tulare
    Defendant and Respondent
    Martin D. Koczanowicz
    Koczanowicz & Hale
    4215 Tierra Rejada Road, #185
    Moorpark, CA 93021

    David Phillip Hale
    KOCZANOWICZ & HALE
    Attorney at Law
    401 Clovis Ave, Ste. 208
    Clovis, CA 93612

    Tulare City Council
    Defendant and Respondent
  • Docket (Register of Actions)
    Date Description Notes
    02/11/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Applt Manro in pro per appeals from judgment after court trial entered 11/10/15.
    02/11/2016 Filing fee. $775 by Applt Manro in pro per
    02/16/2016 Default notice sent; no case information statement filed, or statement incomplete. Applt Manro in pro per
    02/16/2016 Letter sent to counsel re: And Superior Court re: This letter is to notify you that the above-entitled case has not been selected for this court's mediation program (Local Rules, rule 2). However, in accordance with this local rule, the parties may file a stipulation requesting the case be reconsidered for mediation. If a stipulation is filed, the parties will be notified promptly of the court's decision. Suspension of record preparation pursuant to local rule 2 is lifted and California Rules of Court, rules 8.121, 8.124 and 8.216, are reinstated as of the date of this letter.
    02/17/2016 Proceeding by 8.124 - no reporter's transcript. Filed 2/4/16 by Applt Manro in pro per; requesting Administrative Record.
    02/17/2016 70 day letter sent (rule 8.124).
    02/17/2016 Civil case information statement filed. by appellant Manro in pro per
    02/23/2016 Filed proof of service. By appellant Manro showing service of Civil Information Statement on respondent
    04/08/2016 Administrative record received **********. 5 volumes; pages AR0001 through AR1435 (placed on shelf)
    04/14/2016 Appellant's opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Don Manro Pro Per
    04/14/2016 Appellant's appendix filed. Applt Manro in pro per
    04/14/2016 Case start date.
    04/15/2016 Change of address filed for: Atty Koczanowicz obo respondent
    04/15/2016 Filed proof of service. for Change of Address by Atty Koczanowicz obo respondent
    04/28/2016 Returned document for non-conformance. Motion to Augment & POS by Atty Koczanowicz obo respondent is being rejected for the following reason: motion, exhibits & attachments must be submitted as separate documents.
    04/29/2016 Motion/application to augment record filed. "Motion to Augment Record on Appeal . . ." by Atty Koczanowiez obo Respondents City of Turlare et al. *** Holding for 15 days for possible Opposition ****
    05/16/2016 Opposition filed. Opposition to Motion to Augment Record on Appeal; Opposing Memorandum; and Opposing Declaration by Applt Manro in pro per.
    05/16/2016 Reply filed to: Reply to Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Augment Record on Appeal by Atty Koczanowicz obo Respondents
    05/16/2016 Filed proof of service. On Reply to Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Augment Record on Appeal by Atty Koczanowicz obo Respondents
    05/16/2016 To court. "Motion to Augment Record on Appeal . . ." by Atty Koczanowiez obo Respondents City of Turlare et al.
    05/16/2016 Respondent's brief. Defendant and Respondent: City of Tulare Attorney: Martin D. Koczanowicz Defendant and Respondent: Tulare City Council Attorney: Martin D. Koczanowicz
    05/16/2016 Filed proof of service. for Respondent's Brief by Atty Koczanowicz obo Respondents
  • Disposition
    Description: Affirmed in full
    Date: 10/31/2016
    Status: Final The judgment is affirmed. Respondents are awarded costs on appeal. (Detjen/Peña/Bruce) 35 pages
    Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
    Author: Smith, M. Bruce
    Participants: Pena, Jr., Rosendo (Concur) Detjen, Jennifer R.S. (Concur)
    Case Citation: none